Home/Case Law/LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL.

San Francisco
ADJ3609412 (SAC 0305896)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and modified a prior award, primarily to reflect applicant's election under Labor Code § 5500.5 to proceed solely against Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company for a cumulative trauma injury. The Board found that applicant's injury occurred between June 21, 2000, and June 21, 2001, with Argonaut covering the earlier portion and Lumbermens the latter. Consequently, the award against Argonaut was rescinded, leaving Lumbermens liable for 83% permanent disability, a life pension, and future medical care, subject to its right to seek contribution from other potentially liable parties. The Board also addressed Lumbermens' arguments regarding substantial evidence and due process, largely adopting the WCJ's reasoning while clarifying the scope of liability.

LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and modified a prior award, primarily to reflect applicant's election under Labor Code § 5500.5 to proceed solely against Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company for a cumulative trauma injury. The Board found that applicant's injury occurred between June 21, 2000, and June 21, 2001, with Argonaut covering the earlier portion and Lumbermens the latter. Consequently, the award against Argonaut was rescinded, leaving Lumbermens liable for 83% permanent disability, a life pension, and future medical care, subject to its right to seek contribution from other potentially liable parties. The Board also addressed Lumbermens' arguments regarding substantial evidence and due process, largely adopting the WCJ's reasoning while clarifying the scope of liability.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. Case Analysis

LINDA CONDRY vs. BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS, LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY, ET AL. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.