CompFox AI Summary
In this workers' compensation case, the defendant sought removal of the judge's findings, dismissal of the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), and a new panel, alleging an ex parte communication by the applicant with the AME. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition for removal, upholding the judge's decision. The WCAB found no effort to improperly influence the AME, and that the communication occurred after the record was submitted on a non-disputed issue. The WCAB agreed that excluding the specific report from the alleged ex parte communication was sufficient to protect due process.
LON VALLEM vs. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, CDCR, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this workers' compensation case, the defendant sought removal of the judge's findings, dismissal of the Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME), and a new panel, alleging an ex parte communication by the applicant with the AME. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) denied the petition for removal, upholding the judge's decision. The WCAB found no effort to improperly influence the AME, and that the communication occurred after the record was submitted on a non-disputed issue. The WCAB agreed that excluding the specific report from the alleged ex parte communication was sufficient to protect due process.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.