Home/Case Law/LUZVIMINDA U. SENAS vs. EBMUD and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, US Bank and Travelers
Regular DecisionOrders Denying Petitions

LUZVIMINDA U. SENAS vs. EBMUD and SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, US Bank and Travelers

Filed: Oct 01, 2008
San Francisco
ADJ2703329 (OAK 0339383)

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant, Luzviminda U. Senas, filed petitions to disqualify Judge Valerie M. Sauban and for automatic reassignment, alleging bias and prejudice. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied both petitions, finding no evidence of bias in the judge's past rulings and noting that the reassignment petition was premature as the case was not yet set for trial. The Board concluded that the judge acted fairly and impartially in prior proceedings.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant, Luzviminda U. Senas, filed petitions to disqualify Judge Valerie M. Sauban and for automatic reassignment, alleging bias and prejudice. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied both petitions, finding no evidence of bias in the judge's past rulings and noting that the reassignment petition was premature as the case was not yet set for trial. The Board concluded that the judge acted fairly and impartially in prior proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.