Home/Case Law/LYNDA SHEPARD vs. CALIFORNIA SAVINGS AND LOAN, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, HARTFORD, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

LYNDA SHEPARD vs. CALIFORNIA SAVINGS AND LOAN, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, HARTFORD, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Oct 24, 2011
San Francisco
ADJ7106411

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. This denial was based on the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition to be untimely filed after the approval of a Compromise and Release. The applicant's cumulative trauma claim lacked medical evidence and had significant statute of limitations issues, rendering it valueless. Therefore, the $7,000 settlement was deemed more favorable than proceeding to trial.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's Petition for Reconsideration. This denial was based on the administrative law judge's report, which found the petition to be untimely filed after the approval of a Compromise and Release. The applicant's cumulative trauma claim lacked medical evidence and had significant statute of limitations issues, rendering it valueless. Therefore, the $7,000 settlement was deemed more favorable than proceeding to trial.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

LYNDA SHEPARD vs. CALIFORNIA SAVINGS AND LOAN, REPUBLIC INDEMNITY COMPANY OF AMERICA, HARTFORD, BROADSPIRE (2011) – San Francisco | CompFox