Home/Case Law/MANUEL BARAJAS vs. F&H COLD STORAGE, APPLIED RISK OMAHA
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MANUEL BARAJAS vs. F&H COLD STORAGE, APPLIED RISK OMAHA

Filed: Sep 07, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ6559495

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of an award allowing a chiropractor's lien. The defendant argued the lien should not be allowed as they notified the applicant of their Medical Provider Network (MPN). However, the Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant failed to seek reconsideration of a prior "hold harmless" provision in the Compromise and Release order. This prior order bound the defendant to pay liens, regardless of MPN status, because they did not challenge it within the statutory period. Therefore, the Board upheld the lien award based on the finality of the prior order.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a defendant's petition for reconsideration of an award allowing a chiropractor's lien. The defendant argued the lien should not be allowed as they notified the applicant of their Medical Provider Network (MPN). However, the Board denied reconsideration, finding the defendant failed to seek reconsideration of a prior "hold harmless" provision in the Compromise and Release order. This prior order bound the defendant to pay liens, regardless of MPN status, because they did not challenge it within the statutory period. Therefore, the Board upheld the lien award based on the finality of the prior order.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.