Home/Case Law/MANUELA ALVARADO vs. FOODSCO, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MANUELA ALVARADO vs. FOODSCO, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES

Filed: Sep 11, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ7222405

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was taken from an interlocutory order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. Interlocutory orders concerning procedural or evidentiary matters are not subject to reconsideration. The petition for removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm warranting removal. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report for the denial of removal.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was taken from an interlocutory order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. Interlocutory orders concerning procedural or evidentiary matters are not subject to reconsideration. The petition for removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm warranting removal. The Board adopted the Workers' Compensation Judge's report for the denial of removal.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MANUELA ALVARADO vs. FOODSCO, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES (2012) – San Francisco | CompFox