Home/Case Law/MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A \& L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A \& L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Oct 27, 2009
San Francisco
ADJ6642689

CompFox AI Summary

The WCJ's decision allowing applicant to change treating physicians within the MPN is affirmed. The dispute over the need for treatment falls under Section 4616.3(c), not Section 4062.

MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A & L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCJ's decision allowing applicant to change treating physicians within the MPN is affirmed. The dispute over the need for treatment falls under Section 4616.3(c), not Section 4062.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A \& L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A \& L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A \& L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND Case Analysis

MANUELA RAMIREZ vs. A \& L STAFFING, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.