CompFox AI Summary
Applicant Marc Lafleur sought reconsideration of an April 18, 2025 Findings and Award, which denied his Petition to Reopen for new and further disability. The initial award found no evidence of new and further disability within five years of his June 11, 2015 injury. Lafleur argued that the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) should have relied on the opinion of Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) Thomas Pattison, M.D., and correctly identified his occupation. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, stating that this is not a final order on the merits but defers a final decision for further review of factual and legal issues, encouraging the parties to consider mediation.
MARC LAFLEUR vs. MILHOUSE CHILDREN'S SERVICES, NON-PROFITS UNITED, SEDGWICK CLAIMS MANAGEMENT SERVICES, INCORPORATED is a workers' compensation case decided in Redding. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Redding.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Applicant Marc Lafleur sought reconsideration of an April 18, 2025 Findings and Award, which denied his Petition to Reopen for new and further disability. The initial award found no evidence of new and further disability within five years of his June 11, 2015 injury. Lafleur argued that the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ) should have relied on the opinion of Agreed Medical Evaluator (AME) Thomas Pattison, M.D., and correctly identified his occupation. The Appeals Board granted the petition for reconsideration, stating that this is not a final order on the merits but defers a final decision for further review of factual and legal issues, encouraging the parties to consider mediation.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.