CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied SCIF's petition for reconsideration but granted Travelers' petition. The Board rescinded the original award because the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on the date of injury was based on an incorrect legal theory, conflating the exposure period with the actual date of injury and compensable disability. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including clarification from the AME, to determine the correct date of injury and apportion liability. The employer's insurers, SCIF and Travelers, are to continue providing benefits while these issues are resolved.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied SCIF's petition for reconsideration but granted Travelers' petition. The Board rescinded the original award because the Agreed Medical Evaluator's opinion on the date of injury was based on an incorrect legal theory, conflating the exposure period with the actual date of injury and compensable disability. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings, including clarification from the AME, to determine the correct date of injury and apportion liability. The employer's insurers, SCIF and Travelers, are to continue providing benefits while these issues are resolved.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.