CompFox AI Summary
This case concerns the denial of a defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the continuation of non-medical transportation services for the applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the judge's award, holding that the defendant improperly terminated these services. The Board ruled that the defendant must continue providing transportation until it demonstrates a change in the applicant's condition or circumstances, relying on precedent that prohibits unilateral termination of approved medical treatment. The defendant's petition was also noted for procedural deficiencies, including lack of verification.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case concerns the denial of a defendant's petition for reconsideration regarding the continuation of non-medical transportation services for the applicant. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board affirmed the judge's award, holding that the defendant improperly terminated these services. The Board ruled that the defendant must continue providing transportation until it demonstrates a change in the applicant's condition or circumstances, relying on precedent that prohibits unilateral termination of approved medical treatment. The defendant's petition was also noted for procedural deficiencies, including lack of verification.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.