CompFox AI Summary
This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision grants reconsideration of a prior ruling. The Board adopted the Judge's report, finding that the witness's credibility determination was entitled to great weight and no substantial evidence contradicted it. Consequently, the Board affirmed the prior decision but amended specific findings and struck a portion of the award. The employer's denial of injury to the applicant's left shoulder was determined to be not unreasonable.
MARIA CASTANEDA vs. ARAMARK, ACE AMERICAN INSURANCE COMPANY is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision grants reconsideration of a prior ruling. The Board adopted the Judge's report, finding that the witness's credibility determination was entitled to great weight and no substantial evidence contradicted it. Consequently, the Board affirmed the prior decision but amended specific findings and struck a portion of the award. The employer's denial of injury to the applicant's left shoulder was determined to be not unreasonable.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.