CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Applicant Espinoza's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed from an interlocutory order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The WCAB also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denying this extraordinary remedy. Applicant failed to demonstrate that reconsideration would be inadequate should a final adverse decision occur later. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and the petition for removal were dismissed and denied, respectively.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed Applicant Espinoza's Petition for Reconsideration because it was filed from an interlocutory order, not a final decision that determined substantive rights or liabilities. The WCAB also denied the Petition for Removal, finding no substantial prejudice or irreparable harm would result from denying this extraordinary remedy. Applicant failed to demonstrate that reconsideration would be inadequate should a final adverse decision occur later. Therefore, both the petition for reconsideration and the petition for removal were dismissed and denied, respectively.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.