CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant alleged fraud, claiming an agreed medical examiner was bribed and that she did not receive formal ratings properly. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found no evidence of bribery and that service of documents was proper. The WCJ's report detailed the extensive medical evaluations and the applicant's unsubstantiated claims of fraud and improper service.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's petition for reconsideration. The applicant alleged fraud, claiming an agreed medical examiner was bribed and that she did not receive formal ratings properly. The Board adopted the WCJ's report, which found no evidence of bribery and that service of documents was proper. The WCJ's report detailed the extensive medical evaluations and the applicant's unsubstantiated claims of fraud and improper service.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.