CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied petitions for reconsideration filed by applicants represented pro se, finding the petitions procedurally defective due to lack of original signatures, improper verification, and failure to state all material evidence. Furthermore, the applicants were represented by counsel at the time of filing, and their pro se filings were unauthorized. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicants lacked credibility and failed to prove industrial cumulative trauma injuries.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied petitions for reconsideration filed by applicants represented pro se, finding the petitions procedurally defective due to lack of original signatures, improper verification, and failure to state all material evidence. Furthermore, the applicants were represented by counsel at the time of filing, and their pro se filings were unauthorized. The Board affirmed the WCJ's finding that the applicants lacked credibility and failed to prove industrial cumulative trauma injuries.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.