Home/Case Law/MARIE HINGADA vs. AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC., VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MARIE HINGADA vs. AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC., VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Oct 28, 2016
Van Nuys
ADJ8800095

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Marie Hingada's petition for reconsideration in Case No. ADJ8800095. The Board adopted and incorporated the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). The decision emphasized giving great weight to the WCJ's credibility determinations due to their observation of witnesses. No substantial evidence warranted rejecting the WCJ's credibility findings.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied Marie Hingada's petition for reconsideration in Case No. ADJ8800095. The Board adopted and incorporated the findings of the workers' compensation administrative law judge (WCJ). The decision emphasized giving great weight to the WCJ's credibility determinations due to their observation of witnesses. No substantial evidence warranted rejecting the WCJ's credibility findings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARIE HINGADA vs. AXIS SPECIALTY U.S. SERVICES, INC., VIGILANT INSURANCE COMPANY (2016) – Van Nuys | CompFox