Home/Case Law/MARIELENA VENTURA vs. CALIFORNIA COMMERCE CASINO, TRAVELERS INSURANCE
Regular Decision

MARIELENA VENTURA vs. CALIFORNIA COMMERCE CASINO, TRAVELERS INSURANCE

Filed: Oct 23, 2013
Anaheim
ADJ7699422

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order, not a substantive decision. The Board also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Even if the order were appealable, reconsideration would have been denied on the merits due to the applicant's failure to establish good cause for missing a lien trial. Therefore, the petition was dismissed and removal denied.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the Applicant's petition for reconsideration because it was filed from a non-final interlocutory order, not a substantive decision. The Board also denied the petition for removal, finding no showing of substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. Even if the order were appealable, reconsideration would have been denied on the merits due to the applicant's failure to establish good cause for missing a lien trial. Therefore, the petition was dismissed and removal denied.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARIELENA VENTURA vs. CALIFORNIA COMMERCE CASINO, TRAVELERS INSURANCE (2013) – Anaheim | CompFox