CompFox AI Summary
The applicant sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision that found her March 12, 2003 industrial injury did not cause permanent disability or require further medical treatment. She argued the qualified medical evaluator's report, relied upon by the judge, was not substantial evidence. The Board denied reconsideration because the applicant failed to cite specific evidentiary support as required by board rules. The Board adopted the judge's report recommending denial, which found the applicant was adequately compensated for temporary disability.
MARILYN BROWN vs. STOCKTON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Permissibly Self-Insured is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The applicant sought reconsideration of a Workers' Compensation Appeals Board decision that found her March 12, 2003 industrial injury did not cause permanent disability or require further medical treatment. She argued the qualified medical evaluator's report, relied upon by the judge, was not substantial evidence. The Board denied reconsideration because the applicant failed to cite specific evidentiary support as required by board rules. The Board adopted the judge's report recommending denial, which found the applicant was adequately compensated for temporary disability.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.