CompFox AI Summary
In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board denied the lien claimant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the judge's finding that the defendant's payments for medical treatment were reasonable. The Board also dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, deeming it both untimely filed and procedurally deficient for lacking specificity. The applicant sustained an industrial injury to their back, hips, lower extremities, and psyche on March 18, 2006. The Board adopted the Judge's reasoning and ordered the denial and dismissal accordingly.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
In this workers' compensation case, the Appeals Board denied the lien claimant's Petition for Reconsideration, upholding the judge's finding that the defendant's payments for medical treatment were reasonable. The Board also dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration, deeming it both untimely filed and procedurally deficient for lacking specificity. The applicant sustained an industrial injury to their back, hips, lower extremities, and psyche on March 18, 2006. The Board adopted the Judge's reasoning and ordered the denial and dismissal accordingly.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.