CompFox AI Summary
This case involves Mark Allan's petition for reconsideration and removal, which the Appeals Board dismissed and denied. The Board found that the Administrative Law Judge's decision addressed only evidentiary issues, not a "final" substantive right or threshold matter, rendering it unappealable via reconsideration. Furthermore, the Board determined that Allan failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to warrant the extraordinary remedy of removal. Finally, the Board admonished the defendants and their attorney for failing to comply with board rules, warning of potential sanctions.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves Mark Allan's petition for reconsideration and removal, which the Appeals Board dismissed and denied. The Board found that the Administrative Law Judge's decision addressed only evidentiary issues, not a "final" substantive right or threshold matter, rendering it unappealable via reconsideration. Furthermore, the Board determined that Allan failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm to warrant the extraordinary remedy of removal. Finally, the Board admonished the defendants and their attorney for failing to comply with board rules, warning of potential sanctions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.