Home/Case Law/MARK HILDEBRAND vs. JOSE ESPIRITU aka JOSE VARGAS dba THE HOME IMPROVEMENT HANDYMAN
Regular DecisionPetition for Reconsideration

MARK HILDEBRAND vs. JOSE ESPIRITU aka JOSE VARGAS dba THE HOME IMPROVEMENT HANDYMAN

Filed: Jan 27, 2023
Bakersfield
ADJ9791919

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a petition for reconsideration as untimely. The defendant failed to file their petition within the 25-day statutory period after the award was served by mail. The defendant's argument that they did not receive notice due to a prior address change was rejected because they failed to properly notify the WCAB of their new address as required by regulation. Therefore, the WCAB lacked jurisdiction to consider the untimely petition.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed a petition for reconsideration as untimely. The defendant failed to file their petition within the 25-day statutory period after the award was served by mail. The defendant's argument that they did not receive notice due to a prior address change was rejected because they failed to properly notify the WCAB of their new address as required by regulation. Therefore, the WCAB lacked jurisdiction to consider the untimely petition.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MARK HILDEBRAND vs. JOSE ESPIRITU aka JOSE VARGAS dba THE HOME IMPROVEMENT HANDYMAN (2023) – Bakersfield | CompFox