Home/Case Law/MARTHA CARDOSO vs. MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARTHA CARDOSO vs. MCDONALD'S RESTAURANT

Filed: May 07, 2013
ADJ1611754

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior decision, returning the case to the trial level. The Board found the record insufficient for meaningful review due to the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) procedural errors. These errors included admitting evidence without proper notice or opportunity for the parties to be heard and failing to formally admit evidence or fully address all issues. The Board emphasized that lien claimants bear the burden of proving their charges were reasonable, necessary, and within fee schedules.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior decision, returning the case to the trial level. The Board found the record insufficient for meaningful review due to the Administrative Law Judge's (ALJ) procedural errors. These errors included admitting evidence without proper notice or opportunity for the parties to be heard and failing to formally admit evidence or fully address all issues. The Board emphasized that lien claimants bear the burden of proving their charges were reasonable, necessary, and within fee schedules.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.