Home/Case Law/MARY ANN HEALY vs. ZAKS, HEALY & OWENSBY; KEMPER INSURANCE, Adjusted By BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARY ANN HEALY vs. ZAKS, HEALY & OWENSBY; KEMPER INSURANCE, Adjusted By BROADSPIRE

Filed: Oct 11, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ3739571 (VNO 0387620)

CompFox AI Summary

The applicant sought reconsideration of an order that continued her case to a Mandatory Settlement Conference and further trial, arguing procedural errors by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding the order was procedural and not a final determination. Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board affirmed the WCJ's authority to develop the record and acknowledged the case's protracted history.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The applicant sought reconsideration of an order that continued her case to a Mandatory Settlement Conference and further trial, arguing procedural errors by the Workers' Compensation Judge (WCJ). The Board dismissed the petition for reconsideration, finding the order was procedural and not a final determination. Removal was also denied as the applicant failed to demonstrate substantial prejudice or irreparable harm. The Board affirmed the WCJ's authority to develop the record and acknowledged the case's protracted history.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.