Home/Case Law/MARY ANNE AIKENS vs. CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MARY ANNE AIKENS vs. CHILD ABUSE PREVENTION, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND

Filed: Apr 22, 2025
Sacramento
ADJ9485504

CompFox AI Summary

Applicant Mary Anne Aikens sought reconsideration of a Findings and Award (F&A) from April 15, 2021, regarding injuries sustained in 2009. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the F&A, finding errors in the WCJ's decision regarding apportionment of permanent disability for both orthopedic and psychological injuries. The Board concluded that the medical reports from AME Dr. Joel Renbaum and AME Dr. James Cole lacked sufficient independent justification for their apportionment findings. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further development of the medical record concerning apportionment.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Applicant Mary Anne Aikens sought reconsideration of a Findings and Award (F&A) from April 15, 2021, regarding injuries sustained in 2009. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded the F&A, finding errors in the WCJ's decision regarding apportionment of permanent disability for both orthopedic and psychological injuries. The Board concluded that the medical reports from AME Dr. Joel Renbaum and AME Dr. James Cole lacked sufficient independent justification for their apportionment findings. Consequently, the case was returned to the trial level for further development of the medical record concerning apportionment.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.