Home/Case Law/MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS
Regular Decision

MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Sep 19, 2015
San Diego
ADJ9198799

CompFox AI Summary

Here's a summary for a lawyer in four sentences: The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has issued an Order Dismissing a Petition for Removal in the case of Mary Gomez v. Kaiser Permanente. The petitioner, having withdrawn their July 1, 2015 decision, has caused the WCAB to dismiss the removal petition. This action resolves the removal attempt as requested by the petitioner. The order was filed and served on May 19, 2015.

MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS is a workers' compensation case decided in San Diego. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Diego.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Here's a summary for a lawyer in four sentences:

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) has issued an Order Dismissing a Petition for Removal in the case of Mary Gomez v. Kaiser Permanente. The petitioner, having withdrawn their July 1, 2015 decision, has caused the WCAB to dismiss the removal petition. This action resolves the removal attempt as requested by the petitioner. The order was filed and served on May 19, 2015.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS workers compensation case in San Diego. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS case law summary from San Diego. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS Case Analysis

MARY GOMEZ vs. KAISER PERMANENTE; Permissibly SelfInsured, Administered by SEDGWICK CMS is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Diego. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.