Home/Case Law/MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND

Filed: Aug 06, 2012
ADJ1787355 (SAC 0336410) ADJ1318220 (SAC 0338049)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund's (SIF) petition for reconsideration, affirming the finding of total permanent disability due to a prior condition combined with a later industrial injury. The Board granted the applicant's petition, reversing the original decision to make the applicant personally liable for a medical-legal report. SIF is now liable for the reasonable cost of Dr. Abeliuk's report, which is deemed a necessary medical-legal expense for the applicant's claim. The case was returned for further proceedings to determine the cost of Dr. Abeliuk's report.

MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in . This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in .

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the Subsequent Injuries Benefits Trust Fund's (SIF) petition for reconsideration, affirming the finding of total permanent disability due to a prior condition combined with a later industrial injury. The Board granted the applicant's petition, reversing the original decision to make the applicant personally liable for a medical-legal report. SIF is now liable for the reasonable cost of Dr. Abeliuk's report, which is deemed a necessary medical-legal expense for the applicant's claim. The case was returned for further proceedings to determine the cost of Dr. Abeliuk's report.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND workers compensation case in . Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND case law summary from . Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND Case Analysis

MARY JANE EIDMAN vs. LAW OFFICES OF THOMAS PLUMB, PARADISE CHEVROLET, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND, SUBSEQUENT INJURIES BENEFITS TRUST FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in . This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.