Home/Case Law/MARY RAJOTTE vs. O'CONNOR HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CMS
Regular DecisionRemoval

MARY RAJOTTE vs. O'CONNOR HOSPITAL, SEDGWICK CMS

Filed: Jun 14, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ1900424

CompFox AI Summary

Defendant O'Connor Hospital sought removal from an order continuing the case and not closing discovery. They argued there was no good cause for this and that future evidence should be excluded. The Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's reasoning. However, the Board noted significant delays in the applicant obtaining a qualified medical evaluator's report and cautioned against further delays.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Defendant O'Connor Hospital sought removal from an order continuing the case and not closing discovery. They argued there was no good cause for this and that future evidence should be excluded. The Appeals Board denied the petition, adopting the WCJ's reasoning. However, the Board noted significant delays in the applicant obtaining a qualified medical evaluator's report and cautioned against further delays.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.