Home/Case Law/Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Ross Huffer, a volunteer firefighter, died in his sleep from hypertensive and atherosclerotic heart disease after responding to two calls and attending a drill. His wife, the claimant, filed for workers' compensation death benefits, alleging his death was causally related to his employment duties. The Workers’ Compensation Board denied the claim, a decision which was subsequently affirmed on appeal. The court found insufficient evidence regarding the specific duties Huffer performed on the day prior to his death, thus failing to meet the requirements for the statutory presumption under Volunteer Firefighters’ Benefit Law § 61. A physician's opinion supporting the claim was also dismissed for being based on assumptions and a lack of concrete information.

Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Ross Huffer, a volunteer firefighter, died in his sleep from hypertensive and atherosclerotic heart disease after responding to two calls and attending a drill. His wife, the claimant, filed for workers' compensation death benefits, alleging his death was causally related to his employment duties. The Workers’ Compensation Board denied the claim, a decision which was subsequently affirmed on appeal. The court found insufficient evidence regarding the specific duties Huffer performed on the day prior to his death, thus failing to meet the requirements for the statutory presumption under Volunteer Firefighters’ Benefit Law § 61. A physician's opinion supporting the claim was also dismissed for being based on assumptions and a lack of concrete information.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District workers compensation case in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District case law summary from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District Case Analysis

Matter of Huffer v. Nesconset Fire District is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.