Home/Case Law/Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities
Regular Panel Decision DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

Claimant sustained work-related neck and back injuries in a December 2006 accident while working for Salamanca Board of Public Utilities, establishing a workers' compensation claim. In October 2012, while employed elsewhere, he experienced new symptoms in his left arm and leg after an incident, diagnosed as lower back abnormalities. The carrier for the original claim denied payment for associated medical bills, asserting a new injury. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge initially agreed with the carrier, but the Workers' Compensation Board reversed, finding the carrier liable due to its failure to rebut the Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 (5) presumption of a causal relationship. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, without costs.

Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities is a workers' compensation case decided in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Claimant sustained work-related neck and back injuries in a December 2006 accident while working for Salamanca Board of Public Utilities, establishing a workers' compensation claim. In October 2012, while employed elsewhere, he experienced new symptoms in his left arm and leg after an incident, diagnosed as lower back abnormalities. The carrier for the original claim denied payment for associated medical bills, asserting a new injury. A Workers' Compensation Law Judge initially agreed with the carrier, but the Workers' Compensation Board reversed, finding the carrier liable due to its failure to rebut the Workers’ Compensation Law § 21 (5) presumption of a causal relationship. The Appellate Division affirmed the Board's decision, without costs.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities workers compensation case in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities case law summary from Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities Case Analysis

Matter of Koniak v. Salamanca Board of Public Utilities is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.