Home/Case Law/Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance
Regular DecisionReconsideration

Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance

Filed: Nov 05, 2012
San Francisco
ADJ7642434

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the employer's petition for reconsideration regarding a psyche injury claim. The Board found the applicant's slip and fall on a broken stair was not a sudden and extraordinary employment condition as required by Labor Code section 3208.3(d) for claims filed within six months of employment. Therefore, the applicant's psyche injury claim does not meet this exception. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board granted the employer's petition for reconsideration regarding a psyche injury claim. The Board found the applicant's slip and fall on a broken stair was not a "sudden and extraordinary employment condition" as required by Labor Code section 3208.3(d) for claims filed within six months of employment. Therefore, the applicant's psyche injury claim does not meet this exception. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance Case Analysis

Matthew Austin vs. Bridgestone/Firestone, Old Republic Insurance is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.