CompFox AI Summary
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a $90%$ permanent disability award for an industrial injury. The applicant argues for $100%$ permanent disability without apportionment, while the defendant maintains the original award. The Appeals Board rescinded the original decision and remanded the case for further proceedings on permanent disability, specifically ordering the WCJ to consider the applicant's psychiatric injury's contribution to her current disability, in addition to the previously considered CRPS. A dissenting commissioner argued that the applicant's total permanent disability resulted solely from treatment for the industrial injury, thus precluding apportionment.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves an applicant seeking reconsideration of a $90%$ permanent disability award for an industrial injury. The applicant argues for $100%$ permanent disability without apportionment, while the defendant maintains the original award. The Appeals Board rescinded the original decision and remanded the case for further proceedings on permanent disability, specifically ordering the WCJ to consider the applicant's psychiatric injury's contribution to her current disability, in addition to the previously considered CRPS. A dissenting commissioner argued that the applicant's total permanent disability resulted solely from treatment for the industrial injury, thus precluding apportionment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.