CompFox AI Summary
Deborah McGoodwin sued David McGoodwin and DLM Enterprises, Inc. for breach of contract due to unpaid promissory note payments stemming from a 1989 divorce settlement. The trial court initially granted summary judgment to Deborah, which David appealed. In the first appeal, the appellate court affirmed the denial of David's motion for summary judgment but limited Deborah's recovery to a six-year period, remanding the case. On remand, the trial court again granted Deborah summary judgment, awarding $449,669.86. David appealed this second judgment, raising issues previously decided, and the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment.
McGoodwin v. McGoodwin is a workers' compensation case decided in Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas). This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas).
Full Decision Text1 Pages
Deborah McGoodwin sued David McGoodwin and DLM Enterprises, Inc. for breach of contract due to unpaid promissory note payments stemming from a 1989 divorce settlement. The trial court initially granted summary judgment to Deborah, which David appealed. In the first appeal, the appellate court affirmed the denial of David's motion for summary judgment but limited Deborah's recovery to a six-year period, remanding the case. On remand, the trial court again granted Deborah summary judgment, awarding $449,669.86. David appealed this second judgment, raising issues previously decided, and the appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.