Home/Case Law/MICHAEL BAISCH vs. BALFOUR BEATTY; GALLAGHER BASSETT
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MICHAEL BAISCH vs. BALFOUR BEATTY; GALLAGHER BASSETT

Filed: Dec 21, 2018
San Luis Obispo
ADJ10588461

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Balfour Beatty and Gallagher Bassett. This dismissal was based on the applicant's attorney's failure to provide proof of service demonstrating compliance with Appeals Board Rule 10778. Rule 10778 requires an attorney seeking an increase in fees to notify the applicant of the adverse interest and the applicant's right to independent counsel. The WCAB accepted the applicant's attorney's request to file supplemental pleadings but ultimately found the petition grounds for dismissal due to this procedural deficiency.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) dismissed the Petition for Reconsideration filed by Balfour Beatty and Gallagher Bassett. This dismissal was based on the applicant's attorney's failure to provide proof of service demonstrating compliance with Appeals Board Rule 10778. Rule 10778 requires an attorney seeking an increase in fees to notify the applicant of the adverse interest and the applicant's right to independent counsel. The WCAB accepted the applicant's attorney's request to file supplemental pleadings but ultimately found the petition grounds for dismissal due to this procedural deficiency.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.