CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded a prior finding that it had jurisdiction over the Dallas Cowboys for applicant Michael Barrow's injury claim. The WCAB determined that while applicant's agent, a California resident, negotiated the contract and communicated acceptance from Los Angeles, this action alone did not establish a contract of hire made in California. Crucially, the applicant himself was not in California at the time of acceptance, and the contract required his personal signature to be fully binding. Therefore, the WCAB lacked jurisdiction over this extraterritorial claim against the Dallas Cowboys.
MICHAEL BARROW vs. WASHINGTON REDSKINS, DALLAS COWBOYS FOOTBALL CLUB, NEW YORK GIANTS, TENNESSEE TITANS, CAROLINA PANTHERS, GREAT DIVIDE INSURANCE administered by BERKLEY SPECIALTY UNDERWRITING MANAGERS, LLC, LEGION INSURANCE in liquidation by CIGA, TRAVELERS is a workers' compensation case decided in Anaheim. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Anaheim.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded a prior finding that it had jurisdiction over the Dallas Cowboys for applicant Michael Barrow's injury claim. The WCAB determined that while applicant's agent, a California resident, negotiated the contract and communicated acceptance from Los Angeles, this action alone did not establish a "contract of hire" made in California. Crucially, the applicant himself was not in California at the time of acceptance, and the contract required his personal signature to be fully binding. Therefore, the WCAB lacked jurisdiction over this extraterritorial claim against the Dallas Cowboys.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.