Home/Case Law/MICHAEL HOLLAND vs. ADVANCED EYECARE CENTER OF MANHATTAN BEACH, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MICHAEL HOLLAND vs. ADVANCED EYECARE CENTER OF MANHATTAN BEACH, ZENITH INSURANCE COMPANY

Filed: Dec 22, 2016
Marina Del Rey
ADJ8167521

CompFox AI Summary

This case concerns a lien claimant, Med-Legal Photocopy, whose lien for record copying services was disallowed by the WCJ who also imposed attorney's fees for frivolous tactics. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the WCJ applied an incorrect standard for determining if a "contested claim" existed. The matter is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to reassess the lien claimant's burden of proof regarding the contested claim status and the reasonableness of the expenses. Sanctions may still be appropriate if the lien claimant fails to meet this burden on remand.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case concerns a lien claimant, Med-Legal Photocopy, whose lien for record copying services was disallowed by the WCJ who also imposed attorney's fees for frivolous tactics. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, finding the WCJ applied an incorrect standard for determining if a "contested claim" existed. The matter is returned to the trial level for the WCJ to reassess the lien claimant's burden of proof regarding the contested claim status and the reasonableness of the expenses. Sanctions may still be appropriate if the lien claimant fails to meet this burden on remand.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.