Home/Case Law/MICHAEL KING vs. WARNER BROTHERS
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MICHAEL KING vs. WARNER BROTHERS

Filed: Sep 17, 2012
Van Nuys
ADJ7724159

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's attorney's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's decision. The WCAB found that while the defendant's attorney engaged in some improper conduct and service errors, the attorney's subsequent apology and correction, coupled with the timely filing of a good-faith objection, negated the need for sanctions and penalties. The Board also admonished applicant's attorney for escalating a minor fee dispute into prolonged motion practice, wasting judicial resources.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied the applicant's attorney's petition for reconsideration, upholding the administrative law judge's decision. The WCAB found that while the defendant's attorney engaged in some improper conduct and service errors, the attorney's subsequent apology and correction, coupled with the timely filing of a good-faith objection, negated the need for sanctions and penalties. The Board also admonished applicant's attorney for escalating a minor fee dispute into prolonged motion practice, wasting judicial resources.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MICHAEL KING vs. WARNER BROTHERS (2012) – Van Nuys | CompFox