Home/Case Law/MICHAEL QUEVEDO vs. MAIL WELL/ANDERSON LITHOGRAPH
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MICHAEL QUEVEDO vs. MAIL WELL/ANDERSON LITHOGRAPH

Filed: Nov 05, 2007
San Francisco
AHM 0131796

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's notice of intent to disallow a Compromise and Release is not a final order. Furthermore, the Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of prejudice or irreparable harm to justify the extraordinary remedy. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a decision on the adequacy of the C&R.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board dismissed the defendant's Petition for Reconsideration because the WCJ's notice of intent to disallow a Compromise and Release is not a final order. Furthermore, the Board denied the defendant's Petition for Removal, finding no evidence of prejudice or irreparable harm to justify the extraordinary remedy. The case is returned to the trial level for further proceedings and a decision on the adequacy of the C&R.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.