CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior decision and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board found that the lien claimant failed to prove the reasonableness and necessity of its charges for copying services, but that the defendant waived objections due to failing to contest the invoices within the statutory 60-day period. The Board also noted issues with the lien claimant's service of process and the accuracy of certain invoices, requiring further clarification at the trial level. Finally, the Board found that despite defective service of subpoenas and invoices, the defendants had sufficient notice and opportunity to raise objections, thus suffering no prejudice.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board rescinded a prior decision and returned the matter for further proceedings. The Board found that the lien claimant failed to prove the reasonableness and necessity of its charges for copying services, but that the defendant waived objections due to failing to contest the invoices within the statutory 60-day period. The Board also noted issues with the lien claimant's service of process and the accuracy of certain invoices, requiring further clarification at the trial level. Finally, the Board found that despite defective service of subpoenas and invoices, the defendants had sufficient notice and opportunity to raise objections, thus suffering no prejudice.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.