Home/Case Law/MIGUEL CASTRO vs. OMEGA EXTRUDING OF CALIFORNIA, OLD REPUBLIC INDEMNITY
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

MIGUEL CASTRO vs. OMEGA EXTRUDING OF CALIFORNIA, OLD REPUBLIC INDEMNITY

Filed: Jan 03, 2018
San Bernardino
ADJ10281736

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded a Finding and Order denying applicant Miguel Castro's claim for injury. Initially, the WCJ found that the applicant's medical evidence was insufficient to prove injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). However, upon reconsideration, the WCAB agreed with the WCJ that the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) reports were deficient and did not constitute substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the matter was remanded for further proceedings to develop the medical record, potentially by allowing the QME to supplement their reports.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) rescinded a Finding and Order denying applicant Miguel Castro's claim for injury. Initially, the WCJ found that the applicant's medical evidence was insufficient to prove injury arising out of and in the course of employment (AOE/COE). However, upon reconsideration, the WCAB agreed with the WCJ that the Qualified Medical Examiner's (QME) reports were deficient and did not constitute substantial medical evidence. Consequently, the matter was remanded for further proceedings to develop the medical record, potentially by allowing the QME to supplement their reports.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.