Miguel Cueva vs. Pacific American Fish, Alaska National Insurance Co.

Applicant sought reconsideration of an order approving a compromise and release, alleging the defendant unreasonably delayed payment and seeking penalties. The Appeals Board dismissed the petition, clarifying that it was not a proper petition for reconsideration of the original order. Instead, the applicant's claims regarding delayed payment should be addressed at the scheduled status conference. The Board emphasized that a petition for reconsideration must be taken from a final order, not a procedural dispute about payment execution.