CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior award, finding the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion regarding permanent disability lacked substantial evidence. The AME stated a strict application of the AMA Guides would not reflect applicant's impairment but failed to adequately explain this deviation or the reasoning behind using grip strength as a measure. The WCAB remanded the case to the WCJ for further proceedings, specifically requesting development of the record with a further opinion from the AME. This action aligns with precedent requiring medical opinions to provide sufficient reasoning beyond mere conclusions.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board (WCAB) granted reconsideration and rescinded the prior award, finding the Agreed Medical Examiner's (AME) opinion regarding permanent disability lacked substantial evidence. The AME stated a strict application of the AMA Guides would not reflect applicant's impairment but failed to adequately explain this deviation or the reasoning behind using grip strength as a measure. The WCAB remanded the case to the WCJ for further proceedings, specifically requesting development of the record with a further opinion from the AME. This action aligns with precedent requiring medical opinions to provide sufficient reasoning beyond mere conclusions.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.