Home/Case Law/MIKO PIERACCINI vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, Permissibly Self-Insured
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MIKO PIERACCINI vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, Permissibly Self-Insured

Filed: May 19, 2008
San Francisco
MON 0345249; MON 0279966 MON 0279967; MON 0339982

CompFox AI Summary

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's award, and found that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment for any of the claimed dates. This decision was based on the reviewing of the AME's reports and deposition, which were found to lack substantial evidence regarding causation and dates of injury, rendering the EDD lien moot. Consequently, the EDD was ordered to take nothing on its lien.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Appeals Board granted reconsideration, rescinded the WCJ's award, and found that the applicant did not sustain industrial injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment for any of the claimed dates. This decision was based on the reviewing of the AME's reports and deposition, which were found to lack substantial evidence regarding causation and dates of injury, rendering the EDD lien moot. Consequently, the EDD was ordered to take nothing on its lien.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

MIKO PIERACCINI vs. MARRIOTT INTERNATIONAL, Permissibly Self-Insured (2008) – San Francisco | CompFox