Home/Case Law/Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.
Regular Panel Decision DecisionCourt Order

Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co.

District Court, W.D. Tennessee
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

The Chief Judge reviewed objections to a Magistrate Judge's order concerning arbitration and venue. The Magistrate Judge had previously granted Milan Express Co., Inc.'s motion to stop arbitration and denied Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc.'s motions to compel arbitration and transfer venue. The Chief Judge conducted a de novo review and upheld the Magistrate Judge's findings. The arbitration clause was deemed invalid under Nebraska law, as the Reinsurance Participation Agreement (RPA) related to an insurance policy but did not fall under the exception for contracts between insurance companies. The motion to transfer venue was also denied, with the court emphasizing the convenience of witnesses in Tennessee over the contractual forum-selection clause. The court ultimately adopted the magistrate judge's decisions.

Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. is a workers' compensation case decided in District Court, W.D. Tennessee. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in District Court, W.D. Tennessee.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Chief Judge reviewed objections to a Magistrate Judge's order concerning arbitration and venue. The Magistrate Judge had previously granted Milan Express Co., Inc.'s motion to stop arbitration and denied Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Company, Inc.'s motions to compel arbitration and transfer venue. The Chief Judge conducted a de novo review and upheld the Magistrate Judge's findings. The arbitration clause was deemed invalid under Nebraska law, as the Reinsurance Participation Agreement (RPA) related to an insurance policy but did not fall under the exception for contracts between insurance companies. The motion to transfer venue was also denied, with the court emphasizing the convenience of witnesses in Tennessee over the contractual forum-selection clause. The court ultimately adopted the magistrate judge's decisions.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. workers compensation case in District Court, W.D. Tennessee. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. case law summary from District Court, W.D. Tennessee. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. Case Analysis

Milan Express Co. v. Applied Underwriters Captive Risk Assurance Co. is a legal case related to workers' compensation in District Court, W.D. Tennessee. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.