Home/Case Law/MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND
Regular DecisionWorkers' Compensation

MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND

Filed: Oct 22, 2013
San Francisco
ADJ4113798 (SFO 0409796)

CompFox AI Summary

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed its prior ruling and found no concurrent state jurisdiction over Milford House's injury claim. Despite the applicant's work on ships tied to a pier, a stipulation that 100% of his work occurred on navigable waters led the Board to conclude exclusive federal jurisdiction under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) applies. Therefore, the prior dismissal of the claim by the administrative law judge was reinstated.

MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reversed its prior ruling and found no concurrent state jurisdiction over Milford House's injury claim. Despite the applicant's work on ships tied to a pier, a stipulation that 100% of his work occurred on navigable waters led the Board to conclude exclusive federal jurisdiction under the Longshore and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act (LHWCA) applies. Therefore, the prior dismissal of the claim by the administrative law judge was reinstated.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND workers compensation case in San Francisco. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND case law summary from San Francisco. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND Case Analysis

MILFORD ANDREW HOUSE vs. MOORE DRY DOCK, MOORE DRY DOCK COMPANY, UNITED ENGINEERUNG, BETHLEHEM STEEL, Self Insured, METRO RISK, TRISTAR, FIREMANS FUND is a legal case related to workers' compensation in San Francisco. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.