Home/Case Law/MOISES MEDINA vs. CONTINENTAL PROCESSING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, INTERCARE
Regular DecisionReconsideration

MOISES MEDINA vs. CONTINENTAL PROCESSING, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE GUARANTEE ASSOCIATION for PAULA INSURANCE, INTERCARE

Filed: Dec 28, 2009
San Francisco
1

CompFox AI Summary

The WCJ's inference that the lien was assigned because claimant failed before trial to affirmatively declare the status of the lien as required by Board Rule 10550(d) was not unreasonable. However, an inference is simply that, a kind of presumption that must be analyzed in light of the entire evidentiary record. Here, other evidence calls the inference into question. The case is returned to the trial level for development of the record.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

The WCJ's inference that the lien was assigned because claimant failed before trial to affirmatively declare the status of the lien as required by Board Rule 10550(d) was not unreasonable. However, an inference is simply that, a kind of presumption that must be analyzed in light of the entire evidentiary record. Here, other evidence calls the inference into question. The case is returned to the trial level for development of the record.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.