CompFox AI Summary
This case involves a clerical error in a WCJ's Findings and Order which erroneously stated the applicant did not sustain injury to her psyche. The applicant petitioned for reconsideration, arguing this finding was contrary to evidence. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration solely to correct this clerical error, clarifying the applicant did not sustain injury to her left ankle, foot, and skin. The Board affirmed the WCJ's original decision regarding the applicant taking nothing, largely due to giving great weight to the WCJ's credibility determination.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
This case involves a clerical error in a WCJ's Findings and Order which erroneously stated the applicant did not sustain injury to her psyche. The applicant petitioned for reconsideration, arguing this finding was contrary to evidence. The Appeals Board granted reconsideration solely to correct this clerical error, clarifying the applicant did not sustain injury to her left ankle, foot, and skin. The Board affirmed the WCJ's original decision regarding the applicant taking nothing, largely due to giving great weight to the WCJ's credibility determination.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.