CompFox AI Summary
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied an applicant's petitions for disqualification and removal of the assigned judge. The applicant sought a new judge and a continuance, but the Board found the disqualification petition untimely and lacked evidence of bias. The Board also denied the removal petition, citing no prior request for continuance and sufficient time for the applicant to review case files.
MYCAH DILBECK vs. DAIRY CREEK GOLF COURSE RESTAURANT, STATE COMPENSATION INSURANCE FUND is a workers' compensation case decided in San Francisco. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.
It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in San Francisco.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board denied an applicant's petitions for disqualification and removal of the assigned judge. The applicant sought a new judge and a continuance, but the Board found the disqualification petition untimely and lacked evidence of bias. The Board also denied the removal petition, citing no prior request for continuance and sufficient time for the applicant to review case files.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.