Home/Case Law/Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n
Regular Panel Decision DecisionAppeal

Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n

Court of Appeals of Texas
MISSING

CompFox AI Summary

David Lee Flowers, an employee of D. A. Peachee Drilling Company, suffered severe injuries, including the amputation of both legs, after a drilling rig mast contacted a 66,000-volt power line during seismograph work. Texas Employers’ Insurance Association intervened to recover workers' compensation payments. A jury in the 83rd District Court of Upton County found Nance Exploration Company negligent, awarding Flowers $127,671.11 and the intervenor $15,879.89. Nance Exploration Company appealed the judgment. The appellate court concluded that the high power line's danger was open and obvious, and Flowers, an experienced driller, knew or should have known of the hazard, negating any duty for Nance Exploration Company to warn him. The court further ruled that the act of Flowers' superior, Greer, deliberately lowering the mast into the wire, was a new, independent, and unforeseen act, constituting the sole proximate cause of the injury. Therefore, the appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment, finding Nance Exploration Company not liable.

Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n is a workers' compensation case decided in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Court of Appeals of Texas.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

David Lee Flowers, an employee of D. A. Peachee Drilling Company, suffered severe injuries, including the amputation of both legs, after a drilling rig mast contacted a 66,000-volt power line during seismograph work. Texas Employers’ Insurance Association intervened to recover workers' compensation payments. A jury in the 83rd District Court of Upton County found Nance Exploration Company negligent, awarding Flowers $127,671.11 and the intervenor $15,879.89. Nance Exploration Company appealed the judgment. The appellate court concluded that the high power line's danger was open and obvious, and Flowers, an experienced driller, knew or should have known of the hazard, negating any duty for Nance Exploration Company to warn him. The court further ruled that the act of Flowers' superior, Greer, deliberately lowering the mast into the wire, was a new, independent, and unforeseen act, constituting the sole proximate cause of the injury. Therefore, the appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment, finding Nance Exploration Company not liable.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n workers compensation case in Court of Appeals of Texas. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n case law summary from Court of Appeals of Texas. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n Case Analysis

Nance Exploration Co. v. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Court of Appeals of Texas. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.