Home/Case Law/NANCY GILPEN vs. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, BROADSPIRE
Regular DecisionDecision After Removal

NANCY GILPEN vs. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, BROADSPIRE

Filed: Sep 27, 2010
San Francisco
ADJ4225400 (MON0336507)

CompFox AI Summary

This case involved a discrepancy between verified statements from Dr. Burstein's collections manager and the defendant's attorney regarding service of notice and evidence for a trial. The Appeals Board removed the case to address potential sanctions due to this conflict. While proofs of service suggested documents were sent to Dr. Burstein, the Board could not definitively conclude intent to falsify. Therefore, the Board rescinded its notice of intention to impose sanctions and will not impose them.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

This case involved a discrepancy between verified statements from Dr. Burstein's collections manager and the defendant's attorney regarding service of notice and evidence for a trial. The Appeals Board removed the case to address potential sanctions due to this conflict. While proofs of service suggested documents were sent to Dr. Burstein, the Board could not definitively conclude intent to falsify. Therefore, the Board rescinded its notice of intention to impose sanctions and will not impose them.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.

NANCY GILPEN vs. CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, BROADSPIRE (2010) – San Francisco | CompFox