CompFox AI Summary
The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinded the WCJ's Order Denying Motion to Strike, and returned the case for further proceedings. This action was taken because the WCJ's order lacked a sufficient record of evidence or testimony to support its decision. The Appeals Board found that a lack of proof of service prevented them from determining when parties were notified, potentially violating due process rights. Ultimately, the Board determined a hearing was necessary to admit evidence and allow parties to present their cases.
Full Decision Text1 Pages
The Appeals Board granted removal, rescinded the WCJ's Order Denying Motion to Strike, and returned the case for further proceedings. This action was taken because the WCJ's order lacked a sufficient record of evidence or testimony to support its decision. The Appeals Board found that a lack of proof of service prevented them from determining when parties were notified, potentially violating due process rights. Ultimately, the Board determined a hearing was necessary to admit evidence and allow parties to present their cases.
Read the full decision
Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.