Home/Case Law/Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services
Regular DecisionRegular Panel Decision

Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services

Filed: May 12, 2025
Van Nuys
ADJ11645837; ADJ11645835

CompFox AI Summary

Navin Razo, a senior insurance examiner/financial analyst, sustained multiple injuries arising out of and in the course of employment with the State of California, Department of Insurance, across two adjudication numbers (ADJ11645837 and ADJ11645835). The Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) awarded retroactive temporary disability and permanent disability based on combined impairment. The defendant sought reconsideration, contending that medical reports relied upon by the WCJ were not substantial medical evidence and that the retroactive temporary disability award conflicted with prior findings. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition and the WCJ's report, ultimately denying the petition for reconsideration, finding the medical evidence substantial and no conflict with prior orders.

Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services is a workers' compensation case decided in Van Nuys. This case addresses legal issues related to compensation claims, benefits, and court rulings.

It is commonly referenced in legal research involving workers' compensation laws in Van Nuys.

Full Decision Text1 Pages

Navin Razo, a senior insurance examiner/financial analyst, sustained multiple injuries arising out of and in the course of employment with the State of California, Department of Insurance, across two adjudication numbers (ADJ11645837 and ADJ11645835). The Workers' Compensation Administrative Law Judge (WCJ) awarded retroactive temporary disability and permanent disability based on combined impairment. The defendant sought reconsideration, contending that medical reports relied upon by the WCJ were not substantial medical evidence and that the retroactive temporary disability award conflicted with prior findings. The Workers' Compensation Appeals Board reviewed the petition and the WCJ's report, ultimately denying the petition for reconsideration, finding the medical evidence substantial and no conflict with prior orders.

Read the full decision

Join + legal professionals. Create a free account to access the complete text of this decision and search our entire database.

Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services workers compensation case in Van Nuys. Legal case summary, ruling, and analysis for attorneys and legal research.

Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services case law summary from Van Nuys. Workers compensation legal decision, case analysis, and court ruling details.

Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services Case Analysis

Navin Razo vs. State of California, Department of Insurance, State Compensation Insurance Fund/State Contract Services is a legal case related to workers' compensation in Van Nuys. This case explains important rulings, legal interpretations, and claim decisions.

Ready to streamline your practice?

Apply these legal strategies instantly. CompFox helps you find decisions, analyze reports, and draft pleadings in minutes.